INTEGRATING AI IN DECISION MAKING IN EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Algorithmic Accountability, AI Decision-Making, Decision Support Systems, Educational Management, Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Educational Governance, Trust.Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming educational management by strengthening institutional planning, administrative efficiency, monitoring, forecasting and evidence-based decision-making. Contemporary educational institutions can employ AI tools such as machine-learning and predictive-analytics systems, natural-language processing applications, learning and institutional analytics platforms, AI-powered dashboards and generative AI assistants to analyse institutional information and support managerial decisions. However, the use of AI in educational decision-making also creates challenges relating to transparency, accountability, algorithmic bias, data privacy, explainability, infrastructure, technical capacity and stakeholder trust. These concerns are particularly important where AI informs high-stakes decisions involving admissions, staff recruitment and promotion, resource allocation, student support, quality assurance, accreditation and institutional planning. This paper examined the integration of AI in decision-making in educational management, with particular attention to its applications, benefits, challenges and prospects. The paper adopted a conceptual and narrative review approach, synthesising literature on AI in education, educational management, AI-supported decision-making, explainable AI, ethical governance and responsible AI. The discussion was guided by the Trust-Centred Explainable Governance Framework (TCEGF), which was proposed in the original version of the paper and is explicitly operationalised in the revised article. The framework links AI-enabled data and analytical tools to AI-generated recommendations, explainability and transparency, human oversight, ethical and algorithmic accountability, stakeholder participation, institutional learning and improved educational-management outcomes. The paper argued that AI should function as a decision-support capability rather than an autonomous substitute for educational managers. It concludes that responsible integration of AI can improve the timeliness, consistency, predictive capacity and evidence base of educational decisions when supported by appropriate governance, explainability, data protection, capacity building and human judgement.
References
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). *IEEE Access, 6*, 52138–52160.
Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. *Information Fusion, 58*, 82–115.
Bozkurt, A., Karadeniz, A., Baneres, D., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Rodríguez, M. E. (2021). Artificial intelligence and reflections from educational landscape: A review of AI studies in half a century. *Sustainability, 13*(2), 800.
Bush, T. (2020). *Theories of educational leadership and management* (5th ed.). SAGE.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. *International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education*.
European Commission. (2024). *Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act).* Publications Office of the European Union.
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. *Harvard Data Science Review, 1*(1).
Holmes, W., Miao, F., Akin-Nibosun, T., & Sharma, R. (2023). *Guidance for generative AI in education and research.* UNESCO.
Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2016). Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics. *Educational Technology Research and Development, 64*(5), 923–938.
Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2023). Reciprocal human-AI interaction in higher education: A framework for responsible use of artificial intelligence in learning and teaching. [Source cited in the original manuscript; bibliographic details should be verified against the final journal record before external publication.]
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). *Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence.* OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). *OECD artificial intelligence policy observatory.* OECD Publishing.
UNESCO. (2021). *Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence.* UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2023). *Guidance for generative AI in education and research.* UNESCO.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 STUDIES IN EDUCATION

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.